Journal of Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences
مجله دانشگاه علوم پزشکی رفسنجان
JRUMS
Medical Sciences
http://journal.rums.ac.ir
69
journal69
1735-3165
2008-7268
10.66224/jrums
fa
jalali
1405
3
1
gregorian
2026
6
1
25
1
online
1
fulltext
fa
بررسی ساختار عاملی و اعتباریابی پرسشنامه باورهای شخصیتی ناکارآمد در دانشجویان ایرانی: یک مطالعه توصیفی
Investigating the Factor Structure and Validation of the Dysfunctional Personality Beliefs Questionnaire in Iranian Students: A Descriptive Study
روانپزشكي
Psychiatry
پژوهشي
Research
<span style="font-size:10pt"><span style="line-height:110%"><span style="direction:rtl"><span style="unicode-bidi:embed"><span style="font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"><b><span lang="AR-SA" style="font-size:11.5pt"><span style="line-height:110%"><span style="font-family:"B Nazanin"">چکیده</span></span></span></b></span></span></span></span></span><br>
<span style="font-size:10pt"><span style="line-height:115%"><span style="direction:rtl"><span style="unicode-bidi:embed"><span style="font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"><b><span lang="AR-SA" style="font-size:11.5pt"><span style="line-height:115%"><span style="font-family:"B Nazanin"">زمینه و هدف:</span></span></span></b> <span lang="FA" style="font-size:11.5pt"><span style="line-height:115%"><span style="font-family:"B Nazanin"">با وجود نقش نظری مهم باورهای شخصیتی ناکارآمد در تبیین آسیبشناسی روانی، کمبود شواهد درباره ساختار عاملی پایدار و کفایت سنجش این سازه در بافت فرهنگی ایران، ضرورت اعتباریابی ابزارهای مرتبط را آشکار میسازد. مطالعه حاضر با هدف تعیین ساختار عاملی و</span></span></span> <span lang="FA" style="font-size:11.5pt"><span style="line-height:115%"><span style="font-family:"B Nazanin"">اعتباریابی</span></span></span> <span lang="FA" style="font-size:11.5pt"><span style="line-height:115%"><span style="font-family:"B Nazanin"">پرسشنامه باورهای شخصیتی ناکارآمد در دانشجویان ایرانی انجام شد.</span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span><br>
<span style="font-size:10pt"><span style="line-height:115%"><span style="direction:rtl"><span style="unicode-bidi:embed"><span style="font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"><b><span lang="FA" style="font-size:11.5pt"><span style="line-height:115%"><span style="font-family:"B Nazanin"">مواد و روشها:</span></span></span></b><span lang="FA" style="font-size:11.5pt"><span style="line-height:115%"><span style="font-family:"B Nazanin""> پژوهش حاضر توصیفی و از نوع همبستگی بود. جامعه آماری شامل همه دانشجویان دانشگاه محقق اردبیلی در سال تحصیلی ۱۴۰۴ بود که از میان آنها ۳۰۰ نفر با روش نمونهگیری تصادفی خوشهای انتخاب شدند. برای گردآوری دادهها از پرسشنامه باورهای شخصیتی ناکارآمد استفاده شد و بهمنظور بررسی روایی همگرا و واگرا، پرسشنامههای پنجعاملی شخصیت و نگرشهای ناکارآمد نیز اجراء گردید</span></span></span><span lang="AR-SA" style="font-size:11.5pt"><span style="line-height:115%"><span style="font-family:"B Nazanin"">. </span></span></span><span lang="FA" style="font-size:11.5pt"><span style="line-height:115%"><span style="font-family:"B Nazanin"">دادهها با استفاده از آمار توصیفی و روشهای استنباطی شامل تحلیل عاملی تأییدی، بررسی پایایی، روایی همگرا و واگرا و ضریب همبستگی پیرسون تجزیه و تحلیل شدند. </span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span><br>
<span style="font-size:10pt"><span style="line-height:115%"><span style="direction:rtl"><span style="unicode-bidi:embed"><span style="font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"><b><span lang="AR-SA" style="font-size:11.5pt"><span style="line-height:115%"><span style="font-family:"B Nazanin"">یافتهها:</span></span></span></b> <span lang="FA" style="font-size:11.5pt"><span style="line-height:115%"><span style="font-family:"B Nazanin"">نتایج نشان داد این مقیاس از پایایی درونی مطلوبی برخوردار است</span></span></span><b> </b><span lang="FA" style="font-size:11.5pt"><span style="line-height:115%"><span style="font-family:"B Nazanin"">(0/82=</span></span></span><span lang="FA" style="font-size:11.5pt"><span style="line-height:115%"><span style="font-family:"Cambria",serif">α</span></span></span><span lang="FA" style="font-size:11.5pt"><span style="line-height:115%"><span style="font-family:"B Nazanin"">). شاخصهای برازش در تحلیل عاملی اکتشافی و تأییدی نیز روایی مناسب آن را تأیید کرد. همچنین، بین ابعاد پنجعاملی شخصیت و باورهای شخصیتی ناکارآمد رابطه معناداری مشاهده نشد (0/05<</span></span></span><span dir="LTR" style="font-size:9.5pt"><span style="line-height:115%">P</span></span><span lang="FA" style="font-size:11.5pt"><span style="line-height:115%"><span style="font-family:"B Nazanin"">) که بیانگر روایی واگرا مطلوب است. در مقابل، بین نگرشهای ناکارآمد و ابعاد باورهای شخصیتی ناکارآمد همبستگی معنادار وجود داشت که نشاندهنده روایی همگرای مناسب مقیاس است (0/01></span></span></span><span dir="LTR" style="font-size:9.5pt"><span style="line-height:115%">P</span></span><span lang="FA" style="font-size:11.5pt"><span style="line-height:115%"><span style="font-family:"B Nazanin"">).</span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span><br>
<span style="font-size:10pt"><span style="line-height:115%"><span style="direction:rtl"><span style="unicode-bidi:embed"><span style="font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"><b><span lang="AR-SA" style="font-size:11.5pt"><span style="line-height:115%"><span style="font-family:"B Nazanin"">نتیجهگیری:</span></span></span></b> <span lang="FA" style="font-size:11.5pt"><span style="line-height:115%"><span style="font-family:"B Nazanin"">نتایج مطالعه حاضر نشان داد پرسشنامه باورهای شخصیتی ناکارآمد از روایی و پایایی مطلوبی برخوردار است و میتواند بهعنوان ابزاری قابلاعتماد برای سنجش این سازه مورد استفاده قرار گیرد.</span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span><br>
<span style="font-size:10pt"><span style="line-height:115%"><span style="direction:rtl"><span style="unicode-bidi:embed"><span style="font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"><b><span lang="FA" style="font-size:11.5pt"><span style="line-height:115%"><span style="font-family:"B Nazanin"">واژههای کلیدی:</span></span></span></b><span lang="FA" style="font-size:11.5pt"><span style="line-height:115%"><span style="font-family:"B Nazanin""> تحلیل عاملی، باورهای شخصیتی ناکارآمد، دانشجویان</span></span></span><span lang="FA" style="font-size:12.0pt"><span style="line-height:115%"><span style="font-family:"B Nazanin""></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span><br>
<span style="font-size:10pt"><span style="line-height:140%"><span style="tab-stops:-45.0pt"><span style="text-autospace:none"><span style="font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"><a name="_Hlk114425361"><b><span style="font-size:9.0pt"><span style="line-height:140%">Background and Objectives:</span></span></b></a> <span style="font-size:9.0pt"><span style="line-height:140%">Despite the important theoretical role of dysfunctional personality beliefs in explaining psychopathology, the limited evidence regarding a stable factor structure and the adequacy of measuring this construct within the Iranian cultural context underscores the necessity of validating related assessment instruments.The present study was conducted with the aim of investigating the factor structure and validation of the Dysfunctional Personality Beliefs Questionnaire in Iranian students.</span></span></span></span></span></span></span><br>
<span style="font-size:10pt"><span style="line-height:140%"><span style="tab-stops:-45.0pt"><span style="text-autospace:none"><span style="font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"><b><span style="font-size:9.0pt"><span style="line-height:140%">Materials and Methods:</span></span></b><span style="font-size:9.0pt"><span style="line-height:140%"> The current study was descriptive and correlational. The statistical population included all students of the University of Mohaghegh Ardabili in the academic year 2025, from whom 300 participants were selected using a multistage cluster random sampling method. Data were collected using the Dysfunctional Personality Beliefs Questionnaire. To examine convergent and divergent validity, the Five-Factor Personality Questionnaire and the Dysfunctional Attitudes Scale were also administered. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and inferential methods, including confirmatory factor analysis, reliability assessment, convergent and divergent validity, and Pearson’s correlation coefficient. </span></span></span></span></span></span></span><br>
<span style="font-size:10pt"><span style="line-height:140%"><span style="tab-stops:-45.0pt"><span style="text-autospace:none"><span style="font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"><b><span style="font-size:9.0pt"><span style="line-height:140%">Results:</span></span></b><span style="font-size:9.0pt"><span style="line-height:140%"> The results showed that this scale had a desirable internal consistency (α=0.82). The fit indices in exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses also confirmed its appropriate validity. Furthermore, no significant relationship was observed between the five‑factor personality dimensions and dysfunctional personality beliefs (p>0.05), indicating desirable divergent validity. In contrast, a significant correlation was found between dysfunctional attitudes and the dimensions of dysfunctional personality beliefs, indicating appropriate convergent validity of the scale (p<0.01).</span></span></span></span></span></span></span><br>
<span style="font-size:10pt"><span style="line-height:140%"><span style="tab-stops:-45.0pt"><span style="text-autospace:none"><span style="font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"><b><span style="font-size:9.0pt"><span style="line-height:140%">Conclusion:</span></span></b><span style="font-size:9.0pt"><span style="line-height:140%"> The results of the current study indicated that the Dysfunctional Personality Beliefs Questionnaire has satisfactory validity and reliability and can be used as a reliable instrument for assessing this construct.</span></span></span></span></span></span></span><br>
<span style="font-size:10pt"><span style="line-height:140%"><span style="tab-stops:-45.0pt"><span style="text-autospace:none"><span style="font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"><b><span style="font-size:9.0pt"><span style="line-height:140%">Keywords:</span></span></b><span style="font-size:9.0pt"><span style="line-height:140%"> Factor analysis, Dysfunctional personality beliefs, Students</span></span></span></span></span></span></span><br>
<span style="font-size:10pt"><span style="line-height:140%"><span style="tab-stops:-45.0pt"><span style="text-autospace:none"><span style="font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"><span style="font-size:9.0pt"><span style="line-height:140%"></span></span></span></span></span></span></span><br>
<span style="font-size:10pt"><span style="line-height:140%"><span style="tab-stops:-45.0pt"><span style="text-autospace:none"><span style="font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"><b><span style="font-size:9.0pt"><span style="line-height:140%">Funding:</span></span></b><span style="font-size:9.0pt"><span style="line-height:140%"> This study was funded by Mohaghegh Ardabili University of Medical Sciences.</span></span></span></span></span></span></span><br>
<span style="font-size:10pt"><span style="line-height:140%"><span style="tab-stops:-45.0pt"><span style="text-autospace:none"><span style="font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"><b><span style="font-size:9.0pt"><span style="line-height:140%">Conflict of interest:</span></span></b><span style="font-size:9.0pt"><span style="line-height:140%"> None declared.</span></span></span></span></span></span></span><br>
<span style="font-size:10pt"><span style="line-height:140%"><span style="tab-stops:-45.0pt"><span style="text-autospace:none"><span style="font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"><b><span style="font-size:9.0pt"><span style="line-height:140%">Ethical considerations:</span></span></b><span style="font-size:9.0pt"><span style="line-height:140%"> The Ethics Committee of Mohaghegh Ardabili University of Medical Sciences approved the study (IR.UMA.REC.1404.004).</span></span></span></span></span></span></span><br>
<span style="font-size:10pt"><span style="line-height:140%"><span style="tab-stops:-45.0pt"><span style="text-autospace:none"><span style="font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"><b><span style="font-size:9.0pt"><span style="line-height:140%">Authors’ contributions:</span></span></b></span></span></span></span></span><br>
<span style="font-size:10pt"><span style="line-height:140%"><span style="tab-stops:-45.0pt"><span style="text-autospace:none"><span style="font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"><b><span style="font-size:9.0pt"><span style="line-height:140%">- Conceptualization: </span></span></b><span style="font-size:9.0pt"><span style="line-height:140%">Sajjad Basharpoor,<b> </b>Shirin Ahmadi</span></span></span></span></span></span></span><br>
<span style="font-size:10pt"><span style="line-height:140%"><span style="tab-stops:-45.0pt"><span style="text-autospace:none"><span style="font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"><b><span style="font-size:9.0pt"><span style="line-height:140%">- Methodology: </span></span></b><span style="font-size:9.0pt"><span style="line-height:140%">Shirin Ahmadi</span></span></span></span></span></span></span><br>
<span style="font-size:10pt"><span style="line-height:140%"><span style="tab-stops:-45.0pt"><span style="text-autospace:none"><span style="font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"><b><span style="font-size:9.0pt"><span style="line-height:140%">- Data collection: </span></span></b><span style="font-size:9.0pt"><span style="line-height:140%">Shirin Ahmadi</span></span></span></span></span></span></span><br>
<span style="font-size:10pt"><span style="line-height:140%"><span style="tab-stops:-45.0pt"><span style="text-autospace:none"><span style="font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"><b><span style="font-size:9.0pt"><span style="line-height:140%">- Formal analysis: </span></span></b><span style="font-size:9.0pt"><span style="line-height:140%">Shirin Ahmadi</span></span></span></span></span></span></span><br>
<span style="font-size:10pt"><span style="line-height:140%"><span style="tab-stops:-45.0pt"><span style="text-autospace:none"><span style="font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"><b><span style="font-size:9.0pt"><span style="line-height:140%">- Supervision: </span></span></b><span style="font-size:9.0pt"><span style="line-height:140%">Sajjad Basharpoor,<b> </b>Shirin Ahmadi</span></span></span></span></span></span></span><br>
<span style="font-size:10pt"><span style="line-height:140%"><span style="tab-stops:-45.0pt"><span style="text-autospace:none"><span style="font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"><b><span style="font-size:9.0pt"><span style="line-height:140%">- Project administration: </span></span></b><span style="font-size:9.0pt"><span style="line-height:140%">Sajjad Basharpoor</span></span></span></span></span></span></span><br>
<span style="font-size:10pt"><span style="line-height:140%"><span style="tab-stops:-45.0pt"><span style="text-autospace:none"><span style="font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"><b><span style="font-size:9.0pt"><span style="line-height:140%">- Writing- original draft: </span></span></b><span style="font-size:9.0pt"><span style="line-height:140%">Shirin Ahmadi</span></span></span></span></span></span></span><br>
<span style="font-size:10pt"><span style="line-height:140%"><span style="tab-stops:-45.0pt"><span style="text-autospace:none"><span style="font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"><b><span style="font-size:9.0pt"><span style="line-height:140%">- Writing – review & editing: </span></span></b><span style="font-size:9.0pt"><span style="line-height:140%">Sajjad Basharpoor,<b> </b>Shirin Ahmadi</span></span><span style="font-size:9.0pt"><span style="line-height:140%"></span></span></span></span></span></span></span><br>
تحلیل عاملی, باورهای شخصیتی ناکارآمد, دانشجویان
Factor analysis, Dysfunctional personality beliefs, Students
19
36
http://journal.rums.ac.ir/browse.php?a_code=A-10-5705-5&slc_lang=fa&sid=1
Sajjad
Basharpoor
سجاد
بشرپور
basharpoor_sajjad@uma.ac.ir
6900319475328460062786
6900319475328460062786
Yes
University of Mohaghegh Ardabili
دانشگاه محقق اردبیلی
Shirin
Ahmadi
شیرین
احمدی
sh.ahmadi@hsu.ac.ir
6900319475328460062787
6900319475328460062787
No
Hakim Sabzevari
دانشگاه حکیم سبزواری