Reviewers Section

  Reviewers Section

  • For Reviewers
The review process is a significant aspect of the publication process of an article. The reviewers’ comments on an article help the editor to make appropriate decisions on an article and also enable the author to improve the manuscript.
The Journal of Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences (JRUMS) uses double-blind peer- review system. The JRUMS relies on the reviewers with a high level of expertise and an ability to work objectively and fairly. It is hoped that the information presented here will be helpful for the reviewers.
  • Reviewers’ Responsibilities

The JRUMS’ reviewers are requested to review the manuscripts critically but constructively. They have to provide detailed comments regarding the manuscript to help the authors improve their work. Noticing the determined deadline is of high importance. The reviewers are asked to notify the editor about any potential conflicts of interest in regard to the authors or the content of a manuscript. They are expected to report possible research misconducts (plagiarism, duplication, and data manipulation). They must keep the confidentiality of the document. They are not permitted to have any direct contact with the authors or pass the manuscript to another reviewer.
Originality, scientific reliability, data validity, ethical aspects, and scientific misconduct are among the factors that must be considered by the reviewers.

View: 30009 Time(s)   |   Print: 1526 Time(s)   |   Email: 180 Time(s)   |   0 Comment(s)

© 2024 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Journal of Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb