Volume 18, Issue 11 (2-2020)
JRUMS 2020, 18(11): 1191-1194 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Shafiee H, Masoudi F. Scientific Feedback Strategy for Authors with Articles Rejected By Scientific Journals. JRUMS 2020; 18 (11) :1191-1194
URL: http://journal.rums.ac.ir/article-1-5134-en.html
URL: http://journal.rums.ac.ir/article-1-5134-en.html
Abstract: (1797 Views)
Authors of scientific articles [j1] face different feedbacks by journal reviewers when they send their articles. Accordingly, the reviewed articles are divided in to 4 groups: 1. Acceptable as stands, 2. Acceptable with minor revision, 3. Acceptable with major revision, 4. Rejected. The addressee to this letter to editor are those authors who are desperate because of their articles being rejected or not having enough quality for publication.
- Scientific feedback, Article review, Scientific prestige, Authors.
Type of Study: Description |
Subject:
Editorial
Received: 2020/01/10 | Accepted: 2020/02/18 | Published: 2020/02/21
Received: 2020/01/10 | Accepted: 2020/02/18 | Published: 2020/02/21
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
