Scientific Feedback Strategy for Authors with Articles Rejected By Scientific Journals
Authors of scientific
articles [j1] face different feedbacks by journal reviewers when they send their articles. Accordingly, the reviewed articles are divided in to 4 groups: 1. Acceptable as stands, 2. Acceptable with minor revision, 3. Acceptable with major revision, 4. Rejected. The addressee to this letter to editor are those authors who are desperate because of their articles being rejected or not having enough quality for publication.
- Scientific feedback, Article review, Scientific prestige, Authors.
[1]- Assistant Prof., Dept. of Anesthesiology, Clinical Research Development Center, Nekouei-Hedayati-Forghani Hospital, Qom University of Medical Sciences, Qom, Iran, ORCID: 0000-0002-7861-4163.
[2]- MSc, Medical Library and Information Science, Clinical Research Development Center, Nekouei-Hedayati-Forghani Hospital, Qom University of Medical Sciences, Qom, Iran, ORCID: 0000-0002-5167-3825.
(Corresponding Author) Tel: (025) 31331604, Fax: (025) 37717674, E-mail: f.masodi@muq.ac.ir
[j1]چکیده انگلیسی با چکیده فارسی همخوانی کامل ندارد.
چکیده انگلیسی مطابق با چکیده فارسی تنظیم گردد.