Volume 23, Issue 7 (11-2024)
JRUMS 2024, 23(7): 650-657 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Rohani Ravari M H, Ebadi A. Introducing the COSMIN Checklist for Use in Rehabilitation Studies: A Review Study. JRUMS 2024; 23 (7) :650-657
URL: http://journal.rums.ac.ir/article-1-7443-en.html
URL: http://journal.rums.ac.ir/article-1-7443-en.html
Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences
Full-Text [PDF 254 kb]
(259 Downloads)
| Abstract (HTML) (617 Views)
Full-Text: (297 Views)
Introducing the COSMIN Checklist for Use in Rehabilitation Studies: A Review Study
Mohammad Hosein Rohani Ravari[1], Abbas Ebadi[2]
Received: 14/07/24 Sent for Revision: 14/08/24 Received Revised Manuscript: 20/10/24 Accepted: 21/10/24
Background and Objectives: Measuring changes in patient performance is crucial in studies assessing the effects of treatments in rehabilitation. Accurate measurement requires precise instruments. The COSMIN checklist is a valuable tool for selecting the best measurement options. This study aims to introduce the COSMIN checklist and its application in rehabilitation sciences. This review study examines the 2015 version of the COSMIN index guide, demonstrating its use in rehabilitation research.
Results: The COSMIN checklist provides a standardized method for evaluating and selecting measurement tools in studies. It also assesses the quality of studies included in systematic reviews. The checklist includes tables that are completed with information from relevant studies, facilitating final decisions on the quality of a study or tool.
Conclusion: Given the importance of measurement in rehabilitation sciences and the standardization provided by the COSMIN checklist, it is a suitable tool for evaluating the quality of measurement tools used in rehabilitation studies.
Keywords: COSMIN checklist, Rehabilitation, Measurement tool
Funding: This study did not have any funds.
Conflict of interest: None declared.
Ethical considerations: Not applicale.
Authors’ contributions:
- Conceptualization: Abbas Ebadi, Mohammad Hosein Rohani Ravai
-Methodology: Abbas Ebadi
-Data collection: Mohammad Hosein Rohani Ravai
-Supervision: Abbas Ebadi
-Project administration: Abbas Ebadi
-Writing - original draft: Mohammad Hosein Rohani Ravai
-Writing - review & editing: Abbas Ebadi, Mohammad Hosein Rohani Ravai
Mohammad Hosein Rohani Ravari[1], Abbas Ebadi[2]
Received: 14/07/24 Sent for Revision: 14/08/24 Received Revised Manuscript: 20/10/24 Accepted: 21/10/24
Background and Objectives: Measuring changes in patient performance is crucial in studies assessing the effects of treatments in rehabilitation. Accurate measurement requires precise instruments. The COSMIN checklist is a valuable tool for selecting the best measurement options. This study aims to introduce the COSMIN checklist and its application in rehabilitation sciences. This review study examines the 2015 version of the COSMIN index guide, demonstrating its use in rehabilitation research.
Results: The COSMIN checklist provides a standardized method for evaluating and selecting measurement tools in studies. It also assesses the quality of studies included in systematic reviews. The checklist includes tables that are completed with information from relevant studies, facilitating final decisions on the quality of a study or tool.
Conclusion: Given the importance of measurement in rehabilitation sciences and the standardization provided by the COSMIN checklist, it is a suitable tool for evaluating the quality of measurement tools used in rehabilitation studies.
Keywords: COSMIN checklist, Rehabilitation, Measurement tool
Funding: This study did not have any funds.
Conflict of interest: None declared.
Ethical considerations: Not applicale.
Authors’ contributions:
- Conceptualization: Abbas Ebadi, Mohammad Hosein Rohani Ravai
-Methodology: Abbas Ebadi
-Data collection: Mohammad Hosein Rohani Ravai
-Supervision: Abbas Ebadi
-Project administration: Abbas Ebadi
-Writing - original draft: Mohammad Hosein Rohani Ravai
-Writing - review & editing: Abbas Ebadi, Mohammad Hosein Rohani Ravai
|
Citation: Rohani Ravari MH, Ebadi A. Introducing the COSMIN Checklist for Use in Rehabilitation Studies: A Review Study. J Rafsanjan Univ Med Sci 2024; 23 (7): 650-57. [Farsi]
|
[1]- PhD in Speech Therapy, Assistant Prof., Dept. of Speech Therapy, School of Paramedical Sciences, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
[2]- PhD in Nursing, Prof., Nursing Care Research Center, Clinical Sciences Research Institute, School of Nursing, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran, ORCID: 0000-0002-2911-7005
(Corresponding Author) Tel: (051) 38846710, E-mail: Ebadi1347@yahoo.com
(Corresponding Author) Tel: (051) 38846710, E-mail: Ebadi1347@yahoo.com
Type of Study: Applicable |
Subject:
Rehabilitation
Received: 2024/07/10 | Accepted: 2024/10/22 | Published: 2024/11/30
Received: 2024/07/10 | Accepted: 2024/10/22 | Published: 2024/11/30
References
1. Küçükdeveci AA, Tennant A, Grimby G, Franchignoni F. Strategies for assessment and outcome measurement in physical and rehabilitation medicine: an educational review. J Rehabil Med 2011; 43(8): 661-72.
2. Shirin Abadi Farahani A, Rasouli M, Yaghmaee F, Alavi Majd H. Index for selecting an appropriate instrument to conduct research in health sciences: Introducing the COSMIN checklist. JHPM 2015; 4(4): 1-13 [Farsi].
3. Mokkink LB, Prinsen CAC, Bouter LM, de Vet HCW, Terwee CB. The COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) and how to select an outcome measurement instrument. Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy 2016; 20(2): 105-13.
4. Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, Alonso J, Stratford PW, Knol DL, et al. COSMIN checklist manual. Amsterdam: University Medical Center 2012.
5. Downing J, Namisango E, Harding R. Outcome measurement in paediatric palliative care: lessons from the past and future developments. Ann Palliat Med 2018.
6. Kupeli N, Candy B, Tamura-Rose G, Schofield G, Webber N, Hicks SE, et al. Tools Measuring Quality of Death, Dying, and Care, Completed after Death: Systematic Review of Psychometric Properties. Patient 2018.
7. Salame N, Perez-Chada LM, Singh S, Callis Duffin K, Garg A, Gottlieb AB, et al. Are Your Patients Satisfied? A Systematic Review of Treatment Satisfaction Measures in Psoriasis. Dermatology 2018: 1-9.
8. Heinrich A, Mikkola TM, Polku H, Tormakangas T, Viljanen A. Hearing in Real-Life Environments (HERE): Structure and Reliability of a Questionnaire on Perceived Hearing for Older Adults. Ear Hear 2018.
9. Magalhaes Junior HV, Pernambuco LA, Lima KC, Ferreira MAF. Screening for oropharyngeal dysphagia in older adults: A systematic review of self-reported questionnaires. Gerodontology 2018.
10. Benfer KA, Weir KA, Boyd RN. Clinimetrics of measures of oropharyngeal dysphagia for preschool children with cerebral palsy and neurodevelopmental disabilities: a systematic review. Dev Med Child Neurol 2012; 54(9): 784-95.
11. Denman D, Speyer R, Munro N, Pearce WM, Chen Y-W, Cordier R. Psychometric Properties of Language Assessments for Children Aged 4–12 Years: A Systematic Review. Front Psychol 2017; 8(1515).
12. Mokkink L, Terwee C, Knol D, Stratford P, Alonso J, Patrick D, et al. Protocol of the COSMIN study: COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments. BMC Medical Research Methodology 2006; 6(1): 2.
13. Terwee CB, Mokkink LB, Knol DL, Ostelo RWJG, Bouter LM, de Vet HCW. Rating the methodological quality in systematic reviews of studies on measurement properties: a scoring system for the COSMIN checklist. Qual Life Res 2012; 21(4): 651-7.
14. Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, Alonso J, Stratford PW, Knol DL, et al. The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes. JCE 2010; 63(7): 737-45.
15. Kean J, Reilly JJHfCRD, Statistics, Implementation. New York NDMP. Item response theory. 2014.
16. DeMars C. Item response theory. 1st ed. USA: Oxford University Press; 2010 April 2, 2010.
17. Mokkink LB, De Vet HC, Prinsen CA, Patrick DL, Alonso J, Bouter LM, et al. COSMIN risk of Bias checklist for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures. Qual Life Res 2018; 27(5): 1171-9.
18. Terwee C, Prinsen C, Chiarotto A, Westerman M, Patrick D, Alonso J, et al. COSMIN methodology for evaluating the content validity of patient-reported outcome measures: a Delphi study. Qual Life Res 2018; 27(5): 1159-70.
19. Prinsen C, Mokkink L, Bouter L, Alonso J, Patrick D, de Vet H, et al. COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures. Qual Life Res 2018; 27(5): 1147-57.
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
