Volume 24, Issue 2 (5-2025)
JRUMS 2025, 24(2): 123-140 |
Back to browse issues page
Ethics code: IR.IAU.ILAM.REC.1403.095
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Valizadeh H, Mami S, Soleimannejad H, Mihandoost Z. Comparing the Effectiveness of Metacognitive Therapy and Time Perspective Therapy on Emotion Regulation in Individuals with Substance Use Disorder: A Quasi-Experimental Study. JRUMS 2025; 24 (2) :123-140
URL: http://journal.rums.ac.ir/article-1-7589-en.html
URL: http://journal.rums.ac.ir/article-1-7589-en.html
Assistant Professor, Department of Psychology, Ilam Branch, Islamic Azad University, Ilam, Iran
Full-Text [PDF 345 kb]
(38 Downloads)
| Abstract (HTML) (102 Views)
Full-Text: (31 Views)
Comparing the Effectiveness of Metacognitive Therapy and Time Perspective Therapy on Emotion Regulation in Individuals with Substance Use Disorder: A Quasi-Experimental Study
Hadis Valizadeh[1], Shahram Mami[2], Homeira Soleimannejad[3], Zainab Mihandost[4]
Received: 08/12/24 Sent for Revision: 18/02/25 Received Revised Manuscript: 08/03/25 Accepted: 09/03/25
Background and Objectives: Substance abuse is a disaster for individuals, their families, and society. Its increasing trend creates significant challenges for individuals and healthcare systems. Effective treatment strategies are essential to address these challenges. Therefore, the present study aimed to compare the effectiveness of metacognitive therapy and time perspective therapy on emotion regulation in individuals with substance use disorder.
Materials and Methods: This research was a quasi-experimental study with a pre-test, post-test, and follow-up design with a control group. The statistical population included all men with substance use disorder referred to addiction treatment centers in Kermanshah in 2024. Sixty individuals were selected via convenience sampling and randomly assigned to three groups (n=20 per group). The metacognitive group received 8 sessions, and the time perspective group received 6 sessions of intervention, while the control group received no intervention. Data were collected using the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale by Gratz and Roemer (2004). The data was analyzed using two-way repeated measures ANOVA.
Results: The effect of the interventions on improving emotion regulation (F=959.50, p=0.001) in individuals with substance use disorder was significant, and these positive effects remained stable during the follow-up period. Additionally, there was a statistically significant difference between the treatment methods (p<0.001), with metacognitive therapy being more effective in regulating the emotions of these individuals (p<0.001).
Conclusion: Considering the impact of metacognitive therapy on emotion regulation in individuals with substance use disorder in the present study, more attention to providing training based on this intervention is recommended.
Keywords: Drug dependence, Emotion regulation, Metacognitive therapy, Time perspective therapy
Funding: This study did not have any funds.
Conflict of interest: None declared.
Ethical considerations: The Ethics Committee of Azad University, Ilam Branch, approved the study (IR.IAU.ILAM.REC.1403.095).
Authors’ contributions:
- Conceptualization: Hadis Valizadeh
- Methodology: Hadis Valizadeh, Shahram Mami, Homeira Soleimannejad, Zeinab Mihandoost
- Data collection: Hadis Valizadeh, Shahram Mami, Homeira Soleimannejad, Zeinab Mihandoost
- Formal analysis: Hadis Valizadeh, Shahram Mami
- Supervision: Shahram Mami
- Project administration: Shahram Mami
- Writing - original draft: Hadis Valizadeh, Shahram Mami, Homeira Soleimannejad, Zeinab Mihandoost
- Writing - review & editing: Hadis Valizadeh, Shahram Mami, Homeira Soleimannejad, Zeinab Mihandoost
Hadis Valizadeh[1], Shahram Mami[2], Homeira Soleimannejad[3], Zainab Mihandost[4]
Received: 08/12/24 Sent for Revision: 18/02/25 Received Revised Manuscript: 08/03/25 Accepted: 09/03/25
Background and Objectives: Substance abuse is a disaster for individuals, their families, and society. Its increasing trend creates significant challenges for individuals and healthcare systems. Effective treatment strategies are essential to address these challenges. Therefore, the present study aimed to compare the effectiveness of metacognitive therapy and time perspective therapy on emotion regulation in individuals with substance use disorder.
Materials and Methods: This research was a quasi-experimental study with a pre-test, post-test, and follow-up design with a control group. The statistical population included all men with substance use disorder referred to addiction treatment centers in Kermanshah in 2024. Sixty individuals were selected via convenience sampling and randomly assigned to three groups (n=20 per group). The metacognitive group received 8 sessions, and the time perspective group received 6 sessions of intervention, while the control group received no intervention. Data were collected using the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale by Gratz and Roemer (2004). The data was analyzed using two-way repeated measures ANOVA.
Results: The effect of the interventions on improving emotion regulation (F=959.50, p=0.001) in individuals with substance use disorder was significant, and these positive effects remained stable during the follow-up period. Additionally, there was a statistically significant difference between the treatment methods (p<0.001), with metacognitive therapy being more effective in regulating the emotions of these individuals (p<0.001).
Conclusion: Considering the impact of metacognitive therapy on emotion regulation in individuals with substance use disorder in the present study, more attention to providing training based on this intervention is recommended.
Keywords: Drug dependence, Emotion regulation, Metacognitive therapy, Time perspective therapy
Funding: This study did not have any funds.
Conflict of interest: None declared.
Ethical considerations: The Ethics Committee of Azad University, Ilam Branch, approved the study (IR.IAU.ILAM.REC.1403.095).
Authors’ contributions:
- Conceptualization: Hadis Valizadeh
- Methodology: Hadis Valizadeh, Shahram Mami, Homeira Soleimannejad, Zeinab Mihandoost
- Data collection: Hadis Valizadeh, Shahram Mami, Homeira Soleimannejad, Zeinab Mihandoost
- Formal analysis: Hadis Valizadeh, Shahram Mami
- Supervision: Shahram Mami
- Project administration: Shahram Mami
- Writing - original draft: Hadis Valizadeh, Shahram Mami, Homeira Soleimannejad, Zeinab Mihandoost
- Writing - review & editing: Hadis Valizadeh, Shahram Mami, Homeira Soleimannejad, Zeinab Mihandoost
[1]- PhD Student of General Psychology, Department of Psychology, Ilam Branch, Islamic Azad University, Ilam, Iran
[2]- Assistant Professor, Department of Psychology, Ilam Branch, Islamic Azad University, Ilam, Iran, ORCID: 0000-0003-2461-435X
(Corresponding Author) Tel: 09181413236, E-mail: Shahram.mami@yahoo.com
(Corresponding Author) Tel: 09181413236, E-mail: Shahram.mami@yahoo.com
[3]- Assistant Professor, Department of Psychology, Ilam Branch, Islamic Azad University, Ilam, Iran
[4]- Assistant Professor, Department of Psychology, Ilam Branch, Islamic Azad University, Ilam, Iran
Type of Study: Research |
Subject:
Psychiatry
Received: 2024/12/8 | Accepted: 2025/03/9 | Published: 2025/05/20
Received: 2024/12/8 | Accepted: 2025/03/9 | Published: 2025/05/20
References
1. Abbasi M, Alizadehfard S, Ghaffari khalig H. Comparison of Empathy and Emotion Recognition between Healthy and Substance-Dependent Individuals under Treatment after Two Months, Six Months, and One Year. Etiadpajohi 2023; 17(68): 113-38. [Farsi]
2. Opheim E, Dalgard O, Ulstein K, Sorli H, Backe O, Foshaug T, et al. Towards elimination of hepatitis C in Oslo: Cross-sectional prevalence studies among people who inject drugs. Drugpo 2024; 123(1): 1042-79.
3. Ma Z, Liu Y, Wan C, Jiang J, Li X, Zhang Y. Health-related quality of life and influencing factors in drug addicts based on the scale QLICD-DA: a cross-sectional study. HRQOL 2022; 20(1): 109-20.
4. Bahram Abadian F, Mojtabaie M, Sabet M. Comparison of the efficacy of acceptance and commitment-based therapy and schema therapy on self-efficacy and craving for change in addicts. JPS 2021; 20(106): 1849-63. [Farsi]
5. Burgkart PL, Vuzic X, Fuchshuber J, Unterrainer HF. Attachment styles, personality organization, and substance use as predictors of emotion regulation strategies suppression and reappraisal in young adults. FPSYT 2022; 12(1): 745-86.
6. Ozer D, Altun OS, Avsar G. Investigation of the relationship between internet addiction, communication skills and difficulties in emotion regulation in nursing students. JAPNU 2023; 42(1): 18-24.
7. Flores-Kanter PE, Moretti L, Medrano LA. A narrative review of emotion regulation process in stress and recovery phases. Heliyon 2021; 1(1): 6-8.
8. Weiss NH, Kiefer R, Goncharenko S, Raudales AM, Forkus SR, Schick MR, et al. Emotion regulation and substance use: a meta-analysis. J Drugalcdep 2022; 23(1): 109-31.
9. Dingle GA, Neves DD, Alhadad SS, Hides L. Individual and interpersonal emotion regulation among adults with substance use disorders and matched controls. BJC 2018; 57(2): 186-99.
10. John-Henderson NA, Counts CJ, Strong NC, Larsen JM, Jeffs M. Investigating the role of emotion regulation in the relationship between childhood trauma and alcohol problems in American Indian adults. JAD 2024; 34(4): 440-45.
11. Garke M, Isacsson NH, Sorman K, Bjureberg J, Hellner C, Gratz KL, et al. Emotion dysregulation across levels of substance use. Psychres 2021; 296(1): 1136-62.
12. Xia W, Li HC, Liang T, Luo Y, Ho LL, Cheung AT, et al. Structured online training for university students to deliver peer-led addiction counselling for young drug abusers in China: Effect on improving knowledge, attitude, confidence, and skills. PEC 2022; 105(4): 1009-17.
13. Ahmadi Roghabadi A, Bagherzadeh Golmakani Z, Akbarzade M, Mansouri A, Khodabakhsh M. Comparison of the effectiveness of acceptance and commitment therapy and metacognitive therapy on adaptive and maladaptive strategies of cognitive emotion regulation in patients with substance use disorder undergoing methadone maintenance treatment. RCPC 2022; 12(1): 60-78. [Farsi]
14. Brown RL, Wood A, Carter JD, Kannis‐Dymand L. The metacognitive model of post‐traumatic stress disorder and metacognitive therapy for post‐traumatic stress disorder: A systematic review. CPP 2022; 29(1): 131-46.
15. Bailey R, Wells A. Feasibility and preliminary efficacy of metacognitive therapy for health anxiety: A pilot RCT. JADR 2024; 16(1): 1007-51.
16. Sheykhangafshe FB, Niri VS, Amiri ZA, Larmaei ST, Esrafilian F. The Effectiveness of Metacognitive Therapy on Depression, Emotion Regulation, and Self-concept in Students with Social Anxiety Disorder: A Quasi-Experimental Study. JJHS 2024; 16(3): 1-10.
17. Vahidi Moghadam N, Khademi A, Hosseinzadeh M, Zeinali A. Comparison of the Effectiveness of Metacognitive Therapy and Positive Therapy on Emotional Regulation of patients with Chronic Hypertension. IJNR 2024; 19(3): 1-11. [Farsi]
18. Salguero JM, Ramos-Cejudo J. A multi-study examination of the relevance of the metacognitive beliefs about uncontrollability in emotion regulation and clinical symptoms. JAD 2023; 340(1): 809-12.
19. Merkebu J, Kitsantas A, Durning SJ, Ma T. What is metacognitive reflection? The moderating role of metacognition on emotional regulation and reflection. FEDUC 2023; 1(8): 141-65.
20. Khajevand S, Bahrainian A, Nasri M, Shahabizadeh F. Investigating the effectiveness of metacognitive interpersonal therapy on the cognitive regulation of emotion and emotional inhibition in adolescents with high-risk behaviors. Journal of Cognitive Psychology 2023; 11(4): 1-2.
21. Elahi M, Najafi M, Mohammadifar M. Comparison of the effectiveness of cognitive-behavioral therapy and metacognitive therapy on psychological distress (stress, anxiety, and depression) in drug addicts. JMPR 2023; 18(71): 13-22. [Farsi]
22. Moeini P, Malihi Alzakerini S, Asadi J, Khajvand Khosheli A. The Comparison of the Effectiveness of Metacognitive Education and Treatment and Cognitive-Behavioral Stress Management on Feeling of Cohesion and Depression in the Spouses of Substance-Dependent Men. SQRA 2021; 15(59): 173-99. [Farsi]
23. Cao H, Yang L, He Y, Su H, Zhang J, Zhang Y. The influence of time perspectives on addictive behavior and its mechanism. APS 2019; 27(4): 666-78.
24. Borisenkov MF, Popov SV, Smirnov VV, Gubin DG, Petrov IM, Vasilkova TN, et al. Association between food addiction and time perspective during COVID-19 isolation. EWD 2022; 27(5): 1585-91.
25. Lin CC. The influence of parenting on gratitude during emerging adulthood: the mediating effect of time perspective. CP 2023; 42(1): 174-84.
26. Fang D, Maglio SJ. Time perspective and helpfulness: Are communicators more persuasive in the past, present, or future tense? JESP 2024; 110(1): 1045-64.
27. McKay MT, Worrell FC, Zivkovic U, Temple E, Mello ZR, Musil B, et al. A balanced time perspective: Is it an exercise in empiricism, and does it relate meaningfully to health and well‐being outcomes? IJP 2019; 54(6): 775-85.
28. Gohar M. Emotion regulation in relation to Cognitive Flexibility and Time Perspective. PID 2022; 25(1): 11-27.
29. Esmaili V, Ariapooran S, Amiri H. The Effectiveness of Emotional Regulation and Time Perspective Therapies on Anxiety and Emotional Dysregulation in Adolescents during the COVID-19 Outbreak. PS 2022; 18(3): 1-18. [Farsi]
30. Morgenroth O, Keck M, Gensicke M. Time will tell: Time perspective as a source for metacognitive emotion-focused coping and its measurement. PID 2021; 168(1): 1103-27.
31. Burhan-Cavusoglu P, Oktay F, Bayram N. Why is time perspective important for emotion regulation? The role of time perspectives on emotion dysregulation among young adults. AYNA 2020; 7(2): 146-66.
32. Azizpour A, Azmoudeh M, Ayromlou H, Hoseini Nasab S. The Effectiveness of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy and Compassion-Focused Therapy on Death Anxiety and Fear of Falling in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis: A Quasi-Experimental Study. J Rafsanjan Univ Med Sci 2025; 23(8): 677-90.
33. Gall M, Borg W, Gall J. Quantitative and qualitative research methods in educational sciences and psychology. Translated by Ahmad Reza Nasr, et al. SAMT 2016; 1(3): 8-11.
34. Gratz KL, Roemer L. Multidimensional assessment of emotion regulation and dysregulation: Development, factor structure, and initial validation of the difficulties in emotion regulation scale. JPBA 2004; 26(1): 41-54.
35. Shahamat, F. Predicting General Health Symptoms (Somatization, anxiety, depression) from Early Maladaptive Schemas. JMPR 2011; 5(20): 103-24. [Farsi]
36. Wells A. Metacognitive therapy for generalized anxiety disorder: An open trial. JBTEP 2006; 37(3): 206-12.
37. Zimbardo PG, Boyd JN. Time perspective, health, and risk taking. InUnderstanding behavior in the context of time. Psychology Press. 2006. pp. 97-119.
38. Smit K, De Brabander CJ, Boekaerts M, Martens RL. The self-regulation of motivation: Motivational strategies as mediator between motivational beliefs and engagement for learning. IJER 2017; 82(1): 124-34.
39. Wells A, Reeves D, Heal C, Fisher P, Doherty P, Davies L, et al. Metacognitive therapy home-based self-help for anxiety and depression in cardiovascular disease patients in the UK: A single-blind randomised controlled trial. PLoS 2023; 20(1): 10041-61
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
