Background and Objective: Most
of employees in the developing countries are exposed to musculoskeletal
disorders (MSDs) due to performing repetitive manual activities. The aim of
this study was to evaluate the risk factors of musculoskeletal
disorders by HAL-TLV, SI and OCRA methods and comparison with others.
Materials and Methods:
This was a
descriptive study conducted on 147 workers employed in industries with manual tasks.
It was used HAL-TLV, SI and OCRA methods in order to consider the risk factors cousing
MSDs. Prevalence of musculoskeletal disorders was assessed by
Nordic questionnaire. Finally, the data was analyzed by Cronbach's Alpha
statistical test, Kendall's Tau-b correlation, Pearson and Concordance
coefficient c.
Results: The final grade of HAL-TLV
in 31.3% of individuals was in range of danger. The mean final score of SI
and OCRA was in range of high risk and moderate risk (7.79 and 4.86),
respectively. There was a linear and direct relationship between OCRA-HAL and
OCRA-SI methods for classified and unclassified data, respectively (Kendall's Tau-b
correlation coefficient= 0.608 and Concordance coefficient c=
0.963 and P-Value< 0.001).
Conclusion: There was a
good correlation between the risk assessment of the methods. It should be paid attention to the undertaken activities and the
factors involved in selective method such as hand-wrist posture, movements
repetition rate, severity and from of force exertion, vibration and also type
and weight of tool used in order to evaluate the upper limbs disorders in
manual activities.
Key words: Upper limb disorders, Repetitive
manual activities, Ergonomic assessment methods.
Funding: This research was funded by Hamadan
University of Medical Sciences.
Conflict of interest:
None declared.
Ethical Approval:
This Ethics Committee of Hamadan University of Medical Sciences Department of
Occupational Health approved the study.
How to cite this
article: Negahban AR, Jalali M, Meshkani M, Rahimpoor R.
Evaluation of
Risk Factors in Musculoskeletal Disorders by HAL-TLV, SI and OCRA Methods and
Comparison with other Methods. J RafsanjanUniv Med
Sci 2014 13(9): 749-64. [Farsi]
Rights and permissions | |
![]() |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |