Volume 22, Issue 8 (11-2023)                   JRUMS 2023, 22(8): 859-872 | Back to browse issues page

Ethics code: IR.UMA.REC.1401.078


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Akhavi Samaraein Z. Structural Equation Model of the Role of Poor Parental Supervision in Predicting Adolescents' Tendency to High-Risk Behaviors with the Mediating Role of School Atmosphere: A Descriptive Study. JRUMS 2023; 22 (8) :859-872
URL: http://journal.rums.ac.ir/article-1-7030-en.html
mohaghegh ardabili
Abstract:   (289 Views)
Background and Objectives: Adolescence is associated with an increased prevalence of health risk behaviors, including substance use and aggressive behavior. The present study was conducted with the aim of determining the structural equation model of the role of poor parental supervision in predicting the tendency of adolescents to risky behaviors with the mediating role of school climate.
Materials and Methods: This study is of a descriptive type and its statistical population includes male students of the second secondary level of Ardabil City in the academic year of 2022. From this population, a sample of 255 people was selected by convenience sampling method, and they answered the questionnaires of High-Risk Behaviors, School Atmosphere, and Poor Parental Supervision. The obtained data were analyzed using structural equation modeling.
Results: The results showed that there is a direct significant relationship between poor parental supervision (with a coefficient value of 0.10) and high-risk behaviors (p<0.001), also there is an indirect significant relationship between poor parental supervision through the mediation of school atmosphere (with a coefficient value of 0.12) and high-risk behaviors (p<0.001).
Conclusion: In general, the results of the present study showed that poor parental supervision directly and indirectly with the mediation of school climate has a significant effect on adolescents' tendency to high-risk behaviors. From the practical point of view, as recommended by psychologists and school counselors, effective psychological interventions to prevent and reduce the high-risk behaviors of adolescents should be designed with the content of training parents to improve their supervision and training adolescents to comply with social norms at schools.
Key words: School climate, High-risk behaviors, Poor parental supervision, Adolescents

Funding: This study was funded by University of Mohaghegh Ardabili.
Conflict of interest: None declared.
Ethical approval: The Ethics Committee of Ardabili University of Medical Sciences approved the study (IR.UMA.REC.1401.078).


How to cite this article: Akhavi Samarein Zahra. Structural Equation Model of the Role of Poor Parental Supervision in Predicting Adolescents' Tendency to High-Risk Behaviors with the Mediating Role of School Atmosphere: A Descriptive Study. J Rafsanjan Univ Med Sci 2023; 22 (8): 859-72. [Farsi]

Full-Text [PDF 757 kb]   (175 Downloads) |   |   Full-Text (HTML)  (325 Views)  
Type of Study: Research | Subject: روانپزشكي
Received: 2023/06/19 | Accepted: 2023/11/7 | Published: 2023/11/19

References
1. Duell N, Steinberg L, Icenogle G, Chein J, Chaudhary N, Di Giunta L, et al. Age patterns in risk taking across the world. J Youth Adolesc 2018; 47: 1052-72.
2. Duell N, Steinberg L. Positive risk taking in adolescence. Child Dev Perspect 2019; 13(1): 48-52.
3. Jankowski PJ, Zamboanga BL. The Protective Influence of Parental Monitoring and Ideological Religiosity on Adolescents’ Hazardous Alcohol Use. J Child Fam Stud 2019; 28: 3315-26.
4. Dou K, Wang LX, Cheng DL, Li YY, Zhang MC. Longitudinal association between poor parental supervision and risk‐taking behavior: The role of self‐control and school climate. J Adolesc 2022; 94(4): 525-37.
5. Govender D, Naidoo S, Taylor M. My partner was not fond of using condoms and I was not on contraception: understanding adolescent mothers’ perspectives of sexual risk behaviour in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. BMC Public Health 2020; 20: 1-17.
6. Anyanwu MU, Demetrovics Z, Griffiths MD, Horváth Z, Czakó A, Bajunirwe F, et al. Problem Gambling Among Adolescents in Uganda: A Cross-sectional Survey Study. J Gambl Stud 2023: 1-15.
7. Gilmore AK, Mosley EA, Oesterle DW, Ridings LE, Umo I, Hutchins A, et al. Teen Well Check: an e-health prevention program for substance use, sexual assault, and sexual risk behaviors for adolescents in primary care. Eur J Psychotraumatol 2023; 14(1): 2157933.
8. Mills R, Mann MJ, Smith ML, Kristjansson AL. Parental support and monitoring as associated with adolescent alcohol and tobacco use by gender and age. BMC Public Health 2021; 21: 1-10.
9. Mihić J, Skinner M, Novak M, Ferić M, Kranželić V. The importance of family and school protective factors in preventing the risk behaviors of youth. Int JEnviron 2022; 19(3): 1630.
10. Sun Y, Li J-B, Oktaufik MPM, Vazsonyi AT. Parental attachment and externalizing behaviors among Chinese adolescents: The mediating role of self-control. J Child Fam Stud 2022; 31(4): 923-33.
11. Grazia V, Molinari L. School climate multidimensionality and measurement: A systematic literature review. Res Pap Educ 2021; 36(5): 561-87.
12. Jo Y, Armstrong T. The development of self-control in late adolescence: An analysis of trajectories and predictors of change within trajectories. Int JOffender Ther Comp 2018; 62(1): 50-72.
13. Piccolo LR, Merz EC, Noble KG, Pediatric Imaging N, Study G. School climate is associated with cortical thickness and executive function in children and adolescents. Dev Sci 2019; 22(1): 12719.
14. Fisher JH, Brown JL. A prospective, longitudinal examination of the influence of childhood home and school contexts on psychopathic characteristics in adolescence. J Youth Adolesc 2018; 47: 2041-59.
15. Burt CH. Self-control and crime: beyond Gottfredson & Hirschi's theory. Annual Review of Criminology 2020; 3: 43-73.
16. Tompson R, Barclay D, Higgins C. The partial least squares approach to causal modeling: Personal computer adoption and uses as an illustration. Issues Sci Technol 1995; 2(2): 284-324.
17. Kannan KS, Manoj K, Arumugam S. Labeling methods for identifying outliers. Int J stat manag syst 2015; 10(2): 231-8.
18. ZadehMohammadi A, Abadi ZA. Risk taking behaviors among adolescents: The strategies to prediction crimes commitment. J Fam Res 2009; 5: 467-85. [Farsi]
19. Gullone E, Moore S, Moss S, Boyd C. The adolescent risk-taking questionnaire: Development and psychometric evaluation. J Adolesc Res 2000; 15(2): 231-50.
20. Brener ND, Eaton DK, Grunbaum A, Hawkins J, Kann L, Kinchen S, et al. Methodology of the youth risk behavior surveillance system. MMWR 2004; 53(12): 1-13.
21. Way N, Reddy R, Rhodes J. Students’ perceptions of school climate during the middle school years: Associations with trajectories of psychological and behavioral adjustment. Am J Community Psychol 2007; 40: 194-213.
22. Elgar FJ, Waschbusch DA, Dadds MR, Sigvaldason N. Development and validation of a short form of the Alabama Parenting Questionnaire. J Child Fam Stud 2007; 16: 243-59.
23. Pavlov G, Maydeu-Olivares A, Shi D. Using the standardized root mean squared residual (SRMR) to assess exact fit in structural equation models. J Educ Psychol Meas 2021; 81(1): 110-30.
24. Shmueli G, Sarstedt M, Hair JF, Cheah J-H, Ting H, Vaithilingam S, et al. Predictive model assessment in PLS-SEM: guidelines for using PLSpredict. Eur J Mark 2019; 53(11): 2322-47.
25. Espinosa‐Hernandez G, Noel NE, Vasilenko SA, McCrimmon J, Moran AH. Associations between parental and adolescent alcohol use: The role of gender and familism support. J Adolesc 2022; 94(7): 1035-40.
26. Liu D, Chen D, Brown BB. Do parenting practices and child disclosure predict parental knowledge? A meta-analysis. J Youth Adolesc 2020; 49: 1-16.
27. Darling N, Tilton-Weaver L. All in the family: Within-family differences in parental monitoring and adolescent information management. Developmental psychology 2019; 55(2): 390.
28. Basharpoor S, Ahmadi S. Designing a Structural Relationship of Cyber Bullying based on Parental Supervision and Emotion Regulation Strategies Mediated by Anger Rumination in Adolescent Students. J Fam Stud 2022; 10(1): 251-74. [Farsi]
29. Shin Y, Miller-Day M, Hecht ML. Differential effects of parental “drug talk” styles and family communication environments on adolescent substance use. J Health Commun 2019; 34(8): 872-80.
30. Liu Y. Research on the Influence Mechanism of Campus Atmosphere on school bullying Phenomenon of Teenagers. Int J Educ Hum SocSci 2023; 7: 358-62.

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2024 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Journal of Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb