Volume 23, Issue 3 (7-2024)
JRUMS 2024, 23(3): 205-221 |
Back to browse issues page
Ethics code: IR.UMA.REC.1402.084
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Senobar L, Atadokht A, Narimani M, Hajloo N. Comparison of the Effectiveness of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation of the Brain from the Skull and Psychodrama on Neuropsychological Skills in Adolescents with Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: A Quasi-Experimental Study. JRUMS 2024; 23 (3) :205-221
URL: http://journal.rums.ac.ir/article-1-7271-en.html
URL: http://journal.rums.ac.ir/article-1-7271-en.html
Full-Text [PDF 342 kb]
(173 Downloads)
| Abstract (HTML) (296 Views)
Full-Text: (211 Views)
Comparison of the Effectiveness of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation of the Brain from the Skull and Psychodrama on Neuropsychological Skills in Adolescents with Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: A Quasi-Experimental Study
Leili Senobar[1], Akbar Atadokht[2], Mohammad Narimani[3], Nader Hajloo[4]
Received: 13/01/24 Sent for Revision: 12/02/24 Received Revised Manuscript: 05/06/24 Accepted: 08/06/24
Background and Objectives: The most common problems of concussions are disorders of neuropsychological skills. Therefore, the aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of direct electrical stimulation of the brain from the skull and psychodrama on the neuro-psychological skills of adolescents with mild concussions.
Materials and Methods: In this quasi-experimental study, the statistical population was all teenagers with brain damage in Ardabil Province who referred to Fatemi Hospital in Ardabil City in 2021-2022 and received a score of 13-15 on the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS). Forty five people were selected from this statistical population by convenience sampling method and were randomly divided into 3 groups of 15 people (experimental groups 1 and 2 and a control group). The experiment group 1 underwent electrical stimulation intervention (10 sessions of 15 minutes), the experiment group 2 underwent psychodrama intervention (13 sessions of 90 minutes), and the control group did not receive any training. Continuous Performance Test, Tower of London Test, and Crawford et al.'s Retrospective and Prospective Memory Questionnaire were used to collect data. Data were analyzed using multivariate analysis of covariance (MANCOVA).
Results: The findings showed that there was a statistically significant difference across the treatment methods. Electrical stimulation sessions were able to positively affect the components of sustained attention (correct response F=4.961, p=0.012 and response time F=2.398, p=0.001), Tower of London Test (errors F=6.518, p=0.004), and dimensions of memory functioning (prospective memory F=12.943, p<0.001 and retrospective memory F=5.984, p=0.005) and improve cognitive dysfunction.
Conclusion: Based on the findings of the current study, the use of electrical stimulation of the brain as a neuro-rehabilitation intervention is recommended to improve the neuropsychological skills of adolescents with mild concussions.
Keywords: Brain stimulation, Psychodrama, Neuropsychological, Mild traumatic brain injury
Funding: This study was funded by University of Mohaghegh Ardabili
Conflict of interest: None declared.
Ethical considerations: The Ethics Committee of University of Mohaghegh Ardabili approved the study (IR.UMA.REC.1402.084)
Authors’ contributions:
Conceptualization: Akbar Atadokht, Leli Senobar
Methodology: Akbar Atadokht, Leli Senobar
Data collection: Leli Senobar
Formal analysis: Nader Hajloo
Supervision: Akbar Atadokht
Project administration: Akbar Atadokht, Mohammad Narimani
Writing - original draft: Leli Senobar
Writing - review & editing: Akbar Atadokht, Leli Senobar
Leili Senobar[1], Akbar Atadokht[2], Mohammad Narimani[3], Nader Hajloo[4]
Received: 13/01/24 Sent for Revision: 12/02/24 Received Revised Manuscript: 05/06/24 Accepted: 08/06/24
Background and Objectives: The most common problems of concussions are disorders of neuropsychological skills. Therefore, the aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of direct electrical stimulation of the brain from the skull and psychodrama on the neuro-psychological skills of adolescents with mild concussions.
Materials and Methods: In this quasi-experimental study, the statistical population was all teenagers with brain damage in Ardabil Province who referred to Fatemi Hospital in Ardabil City in 2021-2022 and received a score of 13-15 on the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS). Forty five people were selected from this statistical population by convenience sampling method and were randomly divided into 3 groups of 15 people (experimental groups 1 and 2 and a control group). The experiment group 1 underwent electrical stimulation intervention (10 sessions of 15 minutes), the experiment group 2 underwent psychodrama intervention (13 sessions of 90 minutes), and the control group did not receive any training. Continuous Performance Test, Tower of London Test, and Crawford et al.'s Retrospective and Prospective Memory Questionnaire were used to collect data. Data were analyzed using multivariate analysis of covariance (MANCOVA).
Results: The findings showed that there was a statistically significant difference across the treatment methods. Electrical stimulation sessions were able to positively affect the components of sustained attention (correct response F=4.961, p=0.012 and response time F=2.398, p=0.001), Tower of London Test (errors F=6.518, p=0.004), and dimensions of memory functioning (prospective memory F=12.943, p<0.001 and retrospective memory F=5.984, p=0.005) and improve cognitive dysfunction.
Conclusion: Based on the findings of the current study, the use of electrical stimulation of the brain as a neuro-rehabilitation intervention is recommended to improve the neuropsychological skills of adolescents with mild concussions.
Keywords: Brain stimulation, Psychodrama, Neuropsychological, Mild traumatic brain injury
Funding: This study was funded by University of Mohaghegh Ardabili
Conflict of interest: None declared.
Ethical considerations: The Ethics Committee of University of Mohaghegh Ardabili approved the study (IR.UMA.REC.1402.084)
Authors’ contributions:
Conceptualization: Akbar Atadokht, Leli Senobar
Methodology: Akbar Atadokht, Leli Senobar
Data collection: Leli Senobar
Formal analysis: Nader Hajloo
Supervision: Akbar Atadokht
Project administration: Akbar Atadokht, Mohammad Narimani
Writing - original draft: Leli Senobar
Writing - review & editing: Akbar Atadokht, Leli Senobar
[1]- PhD Student in Psychology, Dept. of Psychology, Faculty of Educational Sciences and Psychology, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Ardabil, Iran
[2]- Prof. of Psychology, Dept. of Psychology, Faculty of Educational Sciences and Psychology, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Ardabil, Iran
(Corresponding Author) Tel: (045) 31505629, E-Mail: ak_atadokht@yahoo.com
(Corresponding Author) Tel: (045) 31505629, E-Mail: ak_atadokht@yahoo.com
[3]- Prof. of Psychology, Dept. of Psychology, Faculty of Educational Sciences and Psychology, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Ardabil, Iran
[4]- Prof. of Psychology, Dept. of Psychology, Faculty of Educational Sciences and Psychology, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Ardabil, Iran
Type of Study: Applicable |
Subject:
روانپزشكي
Received: 2024/01/12 | Accepted: 2024/06/8 | Published: 2024/07/20
Received: 2024/01/12 | Accepted: 2024/06/8 | Published: 2024/07/20
References
1. Mitra B, Major BP, Reyes J, Surendran N, Bain J, Giesler LP. MicroRNA biomarkers for diagnosis of mild traumatic brain injury and prediction of persistent symptoms: A prospective cohort study. J Clin Neurosci 2023; 115: 38-42.
2. Zinnel L, Bentil SA. Convolutional neural networks for traumatic brain injury classification and outcome prediction. Health Sciences Review 2023; 9: 1-6.
3. Aga Khani K, Islami S, Khara A, Bijandi M. Epidemiological study of traumatic stress in Iran and its comparison with other countries: A review article. J Sch Med, Tehran Univer Med Sci 2019; 76: 437-45. [Farsi]
4. Powell Trevor. Brain Injury Workbook, Exercises for Cognitive Rehabilitation. Translation: Hossein Zare and Shokofe Mousavi. Publications 4th edition, Tehran, Arajmand. 2021; pp 6-7.
5. Riemann L, Voormolen DC, Rauen K, Zweckberger K, Unterberg A, Younsi A. Persistent postconcussive symptoms in children and adolescents with mild traumatic brain injury receiving initial head computed tomography. J Neurosurg Pediatr 2021; 27: 538-47.
6. Jain S, Iverson LM. Glasgow Coma Scale. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing. 2022; pp 27.
7. Naseri Qara FZ, Shafizad M, Hoseni SH. Relationship between Depression after Traumatic Brain Injury and Demographic Characteristics in a Three-Year Follow-up: J Mazandaran Univ Med Sci 2018; 27(157): 133-43. [Farsi]
8. Hara T, Shanmugalingam A, McIntyre A, Burhan AM. The Effect of Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation (NIBS) on Executive Functioning, Attention and Memory in Rehabilitation Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systematic Review. Diagnostics 2021; 11(627): 1-12.
9. Ebrahimi Dastgardi N, Raisi Z, Rezaei S, Nikyar H. Effectiveness of reflexology massage on anxiety and pain intensity of patients with traumatic brain injury. J Health Psychol 2022; 1(41): 67-82. [Farsi]
10. Mozafari M, Mehrinejad SA, Pevastegar M, Thaghafinia M. Investigation of cognitive complications following mild traumatic brain injury on executive function and working memory of brain injury patients. JCP 2019; 6(3): 37-46. [Farsi]
11. Owens JA, Spitz G, Ponsford JL, Dymowski AR, Willmott C. An investigation of white matter integrity and attention deficits following traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj 2018; 32(6): 776-83.
12. Rudroff T, Workman CD. Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation as a Treatment Tool for Mild Traumatic Brain Injury. Brain sci 2021; 806(11): 2-13.
13. Eilam Stock T, George A, Charve LE. Elerehabilitation with Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Improves Cognitive and Emotional Functioning Following a Traumatic Brain Injury: A Case Study. Arch Clinl Neuropsych 2021; 36(3): 442-53.
14. Zaninotto AL, El-Hagrassy MM, Green JR, Babo M, Paglioni VM, Benute GG, et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) effects on traumatic brain injury (TBI) recovery: A systematic review. Dement Neuropsychol 2019; 13(2): 172-9.
15. Narimani M, Atadakht A, Sanobar L, Basharpour S. Comparison of the effectiveness of progressive relaxation and music therapy on the severity of fatigue in women with breast cancer. Health Psychology 2014; 14: 1-12. [Farsi]
16. Nazimi M, Ranjbaripour T, Shahnazari M, Mashaikh M, Yousefi Kashi A Sh. Comparison of the effectiveness of positive psychotherapy and psychotherapy on the hope of breast cancer patients. Clinical Health Psychology 2022; 1(1): 67-79. [Farsi]
17. Rogers Carolyn A, Kosowicz D. Psychodrama: Conception, Evolution, Evidence and Applications. ACRJ 2019; 1832(1135): 30-5.
18. Frydman J. Role theory and executive functioning: Constructing cooperative paradigms of drama therapy and cognitive neuropsychology. The Arts in Psychotherapy 2016; 47: 41-7.
19. Bromandian Y, Mohammadi N, Rahimi Taganki C. Comparison of the effectiveness of group therapy based on interactive and psychographic methods on the emotional self-awareness of adolescent girls with psychological distress. Psychol Achieve 2019; 27(1): 1-22. [Farsi]
20. Sobhanitabar Sh, Hamidi F, Tahmasabipour N. The Effectiveness of drama psychotherapy in reducing neuro-psychological problems of students with post-traumatic syndrome. J Neuropsychology 2019; 6(1): 121-46. [Farsi]
21. Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, Buchner A. G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Re Meth 2007; 39(2): 175-91.
22. Crawford JR, Smith G, Maylor EA, Della Sala S, Logie RH. The Prospective and Retrospective Memory Questionnaire (PRMQ): Normative data 55 and latent structure in a large non clinical sample. Memory 2003; 11: 261-75.
23. Zare H, Alipour A, Mustafaei A. Standardization and validity of retrospective and prospective memory questionnaire. Social Cognition 2013; 3(5): 45-65. [Farsi]
24. Rosvold HE, Mirsky AF, Sarason I, Bransome ED, Beck LH. A continuous performance test of brain damage. JCCP 1956; 20: 343-50.
25. Soleymani A. Comparing the performance of students with and without math learning disorders in the Tower of London test and continuous performance scale. Learning disabilities 2014; 3(4): 56-73.
26. Lezak M, Howieson D, Loring D. Neuropsychological assessment. 5th edition Oxford University Press. Oxford, New York. 2012; pp 17-8.
27. Moreno ZT, Blomkvist LD, Rützel T. Psychodrama, surplus reality and the art of healing. London & New York: Psychology Press. 2000; pp 13.
28. Zare H, Najafi A, Sharifi AA, Sharif al-Hosseini M. The effectiveness of cognitive rehabilitation on the attention and problem solving of children with traumatic brain injury. Cognitive Psychology Quarterly 2018; 6(4): 48-58. [Farsi]
29. Azmoodeh Sh, Soleimani Is, Issazadegan A. The Effect of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on the Cognitive Flexibility and Memory Span in Patients suffering from Temporal Lobe Epilepsy. J Clinical Psychology & Personality 2020; 2(35): 81-93. [Farsi]
30. Christophel TB, Iamshchinina P, Yan C, Allefeld C, Haynes JD. Cortical specialization for attended versus unattended working memory. Nat Neurosci 2019; 21(4): 494-6.
31. Arnould A, Rochat L, Dromer E, Azouvi P, Van der Linden Martial. Multitasking mediate the relationships between episodic memory, attention, executive functions and apathetic manifestations in traumatic brain injury? J neuropsychology 2018; 12(1): 101-19.
32. Chmiel J, Gladka A, Leszek J. The Effect of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) on Anorexia Nervosa: A Narrative Review. Nutrients 2023; 15(20): 1-18.
33. Fukai M, Bunai T, Hirosawa T, Kikuchi M, Ito S, MinabeY, et al. Endogenous dopamine release under transcranial direct-current stimulation governs enhanced attention: a study with positron emission tomography. Transl Psychiatry 2019; 9(115): 2-10.
34. Skurvydas A, Valančiene D, Satas A, Mickevičiene D, Vadopalas K, Karanauskienė D. Are motor and cognitive control, impulsivity and risk-taking behaviour as well as moral decision making determined by the activity of prefrontal cortex during stroop test?. JSHS 2018; 1(108): 30-41.
35. Neville IS, Zaninotto AL, Hayashi CY, Rodrigues PA, Galhardoni R, de Andrade DC. Repetitive TMS does not improve cognition in patients with TBI: A randomized double-blind trial. J Neurology 2019; 93: 190-9.
36. Begemann MJ, Brand BA, Ćurčić Blake B, Aleman A, Sommer IE. Efficacy of non-invasive brain stimulation on cognitive functioning in brain disorders: a meta-analysis. Psychological Medicine 2020; 50(15): 2465-86.
37. Hone Blanchet A, Edden RA, Fecteau S. Online effects of transcranial direct current stimulation in real time on human prefrontal and striatal metabolites. Biological Psychiatry 2016; 80(6): 432-8.
38. Marsman A, Mandl RCW, Klomp DWJ, Cahn W, Kahn RS, Luijten PR, et al. Intelligence and brain efficiency: investigating the association between working memory performance, glutamate, and GABA. Psychiatry 2017; 8: 2-9.
39. Bunai T, Hirosawa T, Kikuchi M, Fukai M, Yokokura M, Ito Sh, at al. tDCS induced modulation of GABA concentration and dopamine release in the human brain: A combination study of magnetic resonance spectroscopy and positron emission tomography. Brain Stimulation 2021; 14: 154-60.
40. Yeşil ÖB, Kırlangıç ŞB. Effects of group psychodrama on the ruminative thinking style, dysfunctional attitudes, anxiety and depressive symptoms: a quasi-experimental study. Arch Psych Psych 2023; 3: 84-93.
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
