Volume 22, Issue 10 (1-2024)
JRUMS 2024, 22(10): 1053-1070 |
Back to browse issues page
Ethics code: IR.IAU.YASOOJ.REC.1402.003
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Holakoie A, Mahmoodi A, Maredpour A. Predicting Psychological Well-Being and Psychological Cohesion Based on Mindfulness and Emotion Regulation Strategies with the Mediating Role of Resilience of the Women on the Verge of Divorce in Isfahan City in 2023: A Descriptive Study. JRUMS 2024; 22 (10) :1053-1070
URL: http://journal.rums.ac.ir/article-1-7173-en.html
URL: http://journal.rums.ac.ir/article-1-7173-en.html
Assistant Professor, Department of Psychology, Yasooj Branch, Islamic Azad University, Yasooj
Abstract: (717 Views)
Background and Objectives: Women on the verge of divorce are exposed to psychological problems. This research was conducted with the aim of determining the predictors of psychological well-being and psychological cohesion based on mindfulness and emotion regulation strategies with the mediating role of resilience of the women on the verge of divorce in Isfahan City in 2023.
Materials and Methods: The research was descriptive and correlational. The statistical population included all the women referred to counseling centers in Isfahan City in 2023, and 302 people were selected as the research sample using convenience sampling method. The participants responded to Gross and John's Emotion Regulation Strategy Questionnaire, Bather's Five-Faceted Mindfulness Questionnaire (FFMQ), Ryff's Psychological Well-Being, Flensburg-Madsen's Psychological Coherence, and Connor and Davidson's Resilience. Data were analyzed using Pearson's correlation test and structural equations modeling.
Results: The results showed that there was a significant difference between mindfulness (p<0.001, β=0.74), emotion regulation strategies (p=0.033, β=0.11) and resilience (p<0.001, β=0.36) and psychological well-being; Mindfulness (β=0.13, p<0.001), emotion regulation strategies (β=0.56, p<0.001) and resilience (β=0.39, p<0.001) and mental coherence; And also mindfulness (p=0.028, β=0.06) and emotion regulation strategies (p=0.022, β=0.45) and resilience. There was also a significant positive relationship between mindfulness, emotion regulation strategies and psychological well-being and psychological cohesion with the mediating role of resilience (p<0.05).
Conclusion: It appears that resilience plays an important role in the relationship between mindfulness and emotion regulation strategies and psychological well-being and psychological cohesion of women on the verge of divorce. It is recommended to try to increase the psychological well-being, psychological cohesion, and resilience of women by holding family education classes.
Key words: Psychological Well-being, Sense of Coherence, Mindfulness, Emotion, Resilience, Women
Funding: This study did not have any funds.
Conflict of interest: None declared.
Ethical approval: The Ethics Committee of Azad University of Yasooj approved the study (IR.IAU.YASOOJ.REC.1402.003).
How to cite this article: Holakoie Ardeshir, Mahmoodi Armin, Maredpour Alireza. Predicting Psychological Well-Being and Psychological Cohesion Based on Mindfulness and Emotion Regulation Strategies with the Mediating Role of Resilience of the Women on the Verge of Divorce in Isfahan City in 2023: A Descriptive Study. J Rafsanjan Univ Med Sci 2024; 22 (10): 1053-70. [Farsi]
Materials and Methods: The research was descriptive and correlational. The statistical population included all the women referred to counseling centers in Isfahan City in 2023, and 302 people were selected as the research sample using convenience sampling method. The participants responded to Gross and John's Emotion Regulation Strategy Questionnaire, Bather's Five-Faceted Mindfulness Questionnaire (FFMQ), Ryff's Psychological Well-Being, Flensburg-Madsen's Psychological Coherence, and Connor and Davidson's Resilience. Data were analyzed using Pearson's correlation test and structural equations modeling.
Results: The results showed that there was a significant difference between mindfulness (p<0.001, β=0.74), emotion regulation strategies (p=0.033, β=0.11) and resilience (p<0.001, β=0.36) and psychological well-being; Mindfulness (β=0.13, p<0.001), emotion regulation strategies (β=0.56, p<0.001) and resilience (β=0.39, p<0.001) and mental coherence; And also mindfulness (p=0.028, β=0.06) and emotion regulation strategies (p=0.022, β=0.45) and resilience. There was also a significant positive relationship between mindfulness, emotion regulation strategies and psychological well-being and psychological cohesion with the mediating role of resilience (p<0.05).
Conclusion: It appears that resilience plays an important role in the relationship between mindfulness and emotion regulation strategies and psychological well-being and psychological cohesion of women on the verge of divorce. It is recommended to try to increase the psychological well-being, psychological cohesion, and resilience of women by holding family education classes.
Key words: Psychological Well-being, Sense of Coherence, Mindfulness, Emotion, Resilience, Women
Funding: This study did not have any funds.
Conflict of interest: None declared.
Ethical approval: The Ethics Committee of Azad University of Yasooj approved the study (IR.IAU.YASOOJ.REC.1402.003).
How to cite this article: Holakoie Ardeshir, Mahmoodi Armin, Maredpour Alireza. Predicting Psychological Well-Being and Psychological Cohesion Based on Mindfulness and Emotion Regulation Strategies with the Mediating Role of Resilience of the Women on the Verge of Divorce in Isfahan City in 2023: A Descriptive Study. J Rafsanjan Univ Med Sci 2024; 22 (10): 1053-70. [Farsi]
Type of Study: Research |
Subject:
روانپزشكي
Received: 2023/10/14 | Accepted: 2024/01/20 | Published: 2024/01/20
Received: 2023/10/14 | Accepted: 2024/01/20 | Published: 2024/01/20
References
1. Hognas RS. Gray Divorce and Social and Emotional Loneliness. In: Mortelmans D, Editor. Divorce in Europe: New Insights in Trends, Causes and Consequences of Relation Break-ups. New York. Cham: Springer International Publishing 2020; 147-65.
2. McDonald JE, Olson JR, Lanning AH, Goddard HW, Marshall JP. Effects of Religiosity, Forgiveness, and Spousal Empathy on Marital Adjustment. Marriage & Family Review 2018; 54(4): 393-416.
3. Carswell C, Brown JVE, Lister J, Ajjan RA, Alderson SL, Balogun-Katung A, et al. The lived experience of severe mental illness and long-term conditions: a qualitative exploration of service user, carer, and healthcare professional perspectives on self-managing co-existing mental and physical conditions. BMC Psychiatry 2022; 22(1): 479.
4. Khakshoor Shandiz F, Shahabizadeh F, Ahi Q, Mojahedi M. The effectiveness of dialectical behavioral therapy on stress and cognitive flexibility in women with type 2 diabetes. Qom Univ Med Sci J 2021; 15(5): 358-67. [Farsi]
5. Ryff CD. Well-Being with soul: science in pursuit of human potential. Perspectives on Psychological Science 2018; 13(2): 242-8.
6. Henn CM, Hill C, Jorgensen LI. An investigation into the factor structure of the Ryff Scales of Psychological Well-Being. SAJIP 2016; 42(1): 1-12.
7. Karagülle OO, Yavuz E, Gülçiçek OB, Solmaz A, Şentürk S, Erdoğan A, et al. Psychological well-being and marital satisfaction in response to weight loss after bariatric surgery. Surg Today 2019; 49(5): 435-42.
8. Tepeli Temiz Z, Elsharnouby E. Relationship Satisfaction and Well-being During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Examining the Associations with Interpersonal Emotion Regulation Strategies. Cognitive Therapy and Research 2022; 46(5): 902-15.
9. Drozek RP, Unruh B, Bateman A. Mentalization-based treatment for pathological narcissism: A handbook: Oxford University Press; 2023. p 34.
10. Trainor LR, Bennett EV, Bundon AM, Tremblay M, Mannella S, Crocker PRE. Inescapable tensions: performance and/or psychological well-being in Olympic and Paralympic athletes during sport disruption. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health 2023; 15(5): 601-18.
11. Sharma PK, Kumra R. Relationship between mindfulness, depression, anxiety and stress: Mediating role of self-efficacy. ISSID 2022; 186: 111363.
12. Walker SA, Olderbak S, Gorodezki J, Zhang M, Ho C, MacCann C. Primary and secondary psychopathy relate to lower cognitive reappraisal: A meta-analysis of the Dark Triad and emotion regulation processes. ISSID 2022; 187(0): 111394.
13. Chen M, Moran LJ, Harrison CL, Ukke GG, Sood S, Bennett CJ, et al. Ethnic differences in response to lifestyle intervention for the prevention of type 2 diabetes in adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Rev 2022; 23(1): 13340.
14. Connor KM, Davidson JR. Development of a new resilience scale: the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC). Depress Anxiety 2003; 18(2): 76-82.
15. Yıldırım M, Arslan G. Exploring the associations between resilience, dispositional hope, preventive behaviours, subjective well-being, and psychological health among adults during early stage of COVID-19. Curr Psychol 2022; 41(8): 5712-22.
16. Schaan VK, Schulz A, Schachinger H, Vogele C. Parental divorce is associated with an increased risk to develop mental disorders in women. Journal of Affective Disorders 2019; 257: 91-9.
17. Brydges CR. Effect Size Guidelines, Sample Size Calculations, and Statistical Power in Gerontology. Innovation in Aging 2019; 3(4): igz036.
18. Khanjani M, Shahidi S, Fathabadi J, Mazaheri MA, Shokri O. Factor structure and psychometric properties of the Ryff’s scale of Psychological well-being, short form (18-item) among male and female students. Thoughts and Behavior in Clinical Psychology 2014; 9(32): 27-36. [Farsi]
19. Flensborg-Madsen T, Ventegodt S, Merrick J. Sense of coherence and physical health. A cross-sectional study using a new scale (SOC II). ScientificWorld Journal 2006; 6: 2200-11.
20. Parandin S, Seyedi P. The effectiveness of self-regulatory education on psychological cohesion and marital turmoil in families with differences in Kermanshah. Journal of Social Psychology 2021; 9(59): 115-29. [Farsi]
21. Baer RA, Smith GT, Allen KB. Assessment of mindfulness by self-report: the Kentucky inventory of mindfulness skills. Assessment 2004; 11(3): 191-206.
22. Tamannaeifar S, Mirzaee M, Asgharnejad Farid AA, Soleimani M. Five Factor Mindfulness Questionnaire: Instruction and Scoring. Developmental Psychology (Journal Of Iranian Psychologists) 2019; 15(59): 336-8. [Farsi]
23. Gross JJ, John OP. Individual differences in two emotion regulation processes: implications for affect, relationships, and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2003; 85(2): 348.
24. Abooei A, Barzegar bafrooee K, Rahimi M. The effectiveness of self-compassion training on emotion regulation of female students with specific learning disorder JEPS 2021; 18(43): 101-21. [Farsi]
25. Ebrahimnataj Y, Bastami H, Taher M. Predicting the anxiety of corona infection based on cognitive emotion regulation strategies, religious beliefs and resilience in students. Shenakht Journal of Psychology and Psychiatry 2023; 10(3): 81-93. [Farsi]
26. Surucu L, Sesen H, Maslakcı A. Regression, Mediation/Moderation, and Structural Equation Modeling with SPSS, AMOS, and Process Macro. France Livre de Lyon 2023; 71-108.
27. Lima LC, Mendes LC. Mindfulness and Psychological Well-being: Effects of a Mindfulness-Based Health Promotion Program on Healthy Adults. Trends in Psychology 2020; 28(2): 213-29.
28. Yosefir rad E, Zoghi L. Improving the Quality of Life and Psychological Well-being of Women on the Verge of Divorce with Regard to Communication and Empathy Skills: The Mediating Role of Mindfulness. Journal of Policing& Social Studies of Women & Family 2021; 9(2): 399-431. [Farsi]
29. Baer R, Gu J, Strauss C. Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire (FFMQ). In: Medvedev ON, Krägeloh CU, Siegert RJ, Singh NN, editors. Handbook of Assessment in Mindfulness Research. Cham. New York. 2022: 1-23.
30. Rehman AU, You X, Wang Z, Kong F. The link between mindfulness and psychological well-being among university students: The mediating role of social connectedness and self-esteem. Current Psychology 2023; 42(14): 11772-81.
31. Tosi M, van den Broek T. Gray divorce and mental health in the United Kingdom. Soc Sci Med 2020; 256: 113030.
32. Tasneem SA, Panwar N. Emotion Regulation and Psychological Well-being as Contributors Towards Mindfulness Among Under-Graduate Students. Hu Arenas 2022; 5(2): 279-97.
33. Kouchi T, Ahmadi V, Mami S, Nademi A. Investigating the Relationship Between Cognitive Emotion Regulation Strategies and Psychological Well-being of University Students in Ilam City, Iran Through Positive and Negative Affect. Middle Eastern Journal of Disability Studies 2022; 12(0): 189. [Farsi]
34. Rouhi M, Manzari Tavakoli A, Tajrobehkar M. The Effectiveness of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy on Coherent Self- Knowledge, Emotion Regulation, and Quality of Life of Hemodialysis Patients: A Quasi-Experimental Study. J Rafsanjan Univ Med Sci 2023; 21(10): 1055-70. [Farsi]
35. Fischer JM, Kandil F-I, Kessler CS, Nayeri L, Zager LS, Rocabado Hennhöfer T, et al. Stress Reduction by Yoga versus Mindfulness Training in Adults Suffering from Distress: A Three-Armed Randomized Controlled Trial including Qualitative Interviews (Relax Study). JCM 2022; 11(19): 5680.
36. Riepenhausen A, Wackerhagen C, Reppmann ZC, Deter H-C, Kalisch R, Veer IM, et al. Positive Cognitive Reappraisal in Stress Resilience, Mental Health, and Well-Being: A Comprehensive Systematic Review. Emotion Review 2022; 14(4): 310-31.
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
