جلد 22، شماره 11 - ( 11-1402 )
جلد 22 شماره 11 صفحات 1224-1205 |
برگشت به فهرست نسخه ها
Ethics code: دربارۀ مقالۀ فعلی صدق نمی‌کند
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Asgarizadeh A, Akbari Zardkhaneh S. Umbrella Reviews: What, Why, and How. JRUMS 2024; 22 (11) :1205-1224
URL: http://journal.rums.ac.ir/article-1-7233-fa.html
URL: http://journal.rums.ac.ir/article-1-7233-fa.html
عسگری زاده احمد، اکبری زردخانه سعید. مرور چتری: چیستی، چرایی و چگونگی. مجله دانشگاه علوم پزشکی رفسنجان. 1402; 22 (11) :1205-1224
دانشگاه شهید بهشتی
چکیده: (1130 مشاهده)
زمینه و هدف: تعداد مرورهای نظام‌مند یا سطح دوم رو به افزایش است؛ حتی بیشتر از افزایش تعداد مطالعات پایه. موضوعات بحث‌برانگیز، یافته‌های سوگیرانه و شواهد غیرقاطع در این دو سطح، سیاست‌گذاران و پژوهش‌گران را به سمت سطح سوم شواهد یا «مرورهای چتری» سوق داده است. با وجود اینکه مرورهای چتری روش‌شناسی نسبتاً جدیدی محسوب می‌شوند، در دهه‌های اخیر تعداد آن‌ها با شیب تندی افزایش یافته است و این نشان از علاقه و نیاز روزافزون به این مسیر تحقیقاتی دارد. راهنماهایی برای انجام مرورهای چتری منتشر شده‌اند؛ بااینحال، ناهمخوانی‌های موجود در این راهنماها، پژوهش‌گران را دربارۀ شیوۀ مناسب انجام سردرگم ساخته‌اند. هدف مطالعۀ حاضر تصریح ضرورت، شرایط، چالش‌ها و تله‌های مرورهای چتری بود. در آخر، راهنماهایی گام به گام برای نحوۀ انجام و گزارش‌دهی یک مرور چتری طرح شدند. امیدواریم متن حاضر و راهنمایی‌های عملی فراهم شده توجه جامعۀ دانشگاهیان ایرانی را به مرورهای چتری جلب کند.
واژه‌های کلیدی: مرور چتری، مرور نظام‌مند، شواهد
واژه‌های کلیدی: مرور چتری، مرور نظام‌مند، شواهد
نوع مطالعه: كاربردي |
موضوع مقاله:
آمار و اپيدميولوژي
دریافت: 1402/9/16 | پذیرش: 1402/12/2 | انتشار: 1402/12/2
دریافت: 1402/9/16 | پذیرش: 1402/12/2 | انتشار: 1402/12/2
فهرست منابع
1. Ioannidis JP. The Mass Production of Redundant, Misleading, and Conflicted Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses. Milbank Q 2016; 94(3): 485-514.
2. Papatheodorou SI, Evangelou E. Umbrella Reviews: What They Are and Why We Need Them. In: Evangelou E, Veroniki AA, editors. Meta-Research: Methods and Protocols. New York, NY: Springer US; 2022. p. 135-46.
3. Sackett DL, Rosenberg WMC, Gray JAM, Haynes RB, Richardson WS. Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn’t. BMJ 1996; 312(7023): 71.
4. Bateman A, O'Connell J, Lorenzini N, Gardner T, Fonagy P. A randomised controlled trial of mentalization-based treatment versus structured clinical management for patients with comorbid borderline personality disorder and antisocial personality disorder. BMC Psychiatry 2016; 16(1): 304.
5. Malda-Castillo J, Browne C, Perez-Algorta G. Mentalization-based treatment and its evidence-base status: A systematic literature review. Psychol Psychother 2019; 92(4): 465-98.
6. Leichsenring F, Steinert C, Rabung S, Ioannidis JPA. The efficacy of psychotherapies and pharmacotherapies for mental disorders in adults: an umbrella review and meta-analytic evaluation of recent meta-analyses. World Psychiatry 2022; 21(1): 133-45.
7. Baker PR, Costello JT, Dobbins M, Waters EB. The benefits and challenges of conducting an overview of systematic reviews in public health: a focus on physical activity. J Public Health (Oxf) 2014; 36(3): 517-21.
8. Caird J, Sutcliffe K, Kwan I, Dickson K, Thomas J. Mediating policy-relevant evidence at speed: are systematic reviews of systematic reviews a useful approach? Evidence & Policy 2015; 11(1): 81-97.
9. Papatheodorou S. Umbrella reviews: what they are and why we need them. European Journal of Epidemiology 2019; 34(6): 543-6.
10. Pollock M, Fernandes RM, Becker LA, Pieper D, Hartling L. Chapter V: Overviews of reviews. In: Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, et al., editors. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions version 64 (updated August 2023): Cochrane; 2023.
11. Pollock M, Fernandes RM, Becker LA, Featherstone R, Hartling L. What guidance is available for researchers conducting overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions? A scoping review and qualitative metasummary. Syst Rev 2016; 5(1): 190.
12. Petrovskaya O, Lau F, Antonio M. Synthesising evidence on patient portals: a protocol for an umbrella review. BMJ Open 2019; 9(3): e024469.
13. Cates CJ, Oleszczuk M, Stovold E, Wieland LS. Safety of regular formoterol or salmeterol in children with asthma: an overview of Cochrane reviews. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012; 10: Cd010005.
14. Hunt H, Pollock A, Campbell P, Estcourt L, Brunton G. An introduction to overviews of reviews: planning a relevant research question and objective for an overview. Systematic Reviews. 2018; 7(1): 39.
15. Payne C, Wiffen PJ, Martin S. Interventions for fatigue and weight loss in adults with advanced progressive illness. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012; 1: Cd008427.
16. Pollock A, Farmer SE, Brady MC, Langhorne P, Mead GE, Mehrholz J, et al. Interventions for improving upper limb function after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014; 11: Cd010820.
17. Harris J, Croot L, Thompson J, Springett J. How stakeholder participation can contribute to systematic reviews of complex interventions. J Epidemiol Community Health 2016; 70(2): 207-14.
18. Fortin PM, Hopewell S, Estcourt LJ. Red blood cell transfusion to treat or prevent complications in sickle cell disease: an overview of Cochrane reviews. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2018; 8: Cd012082.
19. Ryan R, Santesso N, Lowe D, Hill S, Grimshaw J, Prictor M, et al. Interventions to improve safe and effective medicines use by consumers: an overview of systematic reviews. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014; 4: Cd007768.
20. Gillespie DC, Bowen A, Chung CS, Cockburn J, Knapp P, Pollock A. Rehabilitation for post-stroke cognitive impairment: an overview of recommendations arising from systematic reviews of current evidence. Clin Rehabil 2015; 29(2): 120-8.
21. Posadzki P, Watson LK, Ernst E. Adverse effects of herbal medicines: an overview of systematic reviews. Clin Med (Lond) 2013; 13(1): 7-12.
22. Moore RA, Derry S, Aldington D, Wiffen PJ. Adverse events associated with single dose oral analgesics for acute postoperative pain in adults - an overview of Cochrane reviews. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015; 10: Cd011407.
23. Derry CJ, Derry S, Moore RA. Sumatriptan (all routes of administration) for acute migraine attacks in adults - overview of Cochrane reviews. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014; 5: Cd009108.
24. Machado MO, Veronese N, Sanches M, Stubbs B, Koyanagi A, Thompson T, et al. The association of depression and all-cause and cause-specific mortality: an umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. BMC Med 2018; 16(1): 112.
25. Hailes HP, Yu R, Danese A, Fazel S. Long-term outcomes of childhood sexual abuse: an umbrella review. The Lancet Psychiatry 2019; 6(10): 830-9.
26. Dragioti E, Karathanos V, Gerdle B, Evangelou E. Does psychotherapy work? An umbrella review of meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials. Acta Psychiatr Scand 2017; 136(3): 236-46.
27. Zhong L, Chen W, Wang T, Zeng Q, Lai L, Lai J, et al. Alcohol and Health Outcomes: An Umbrella Review of Meta-Analyses Base on Prospective Cohort Studies. Frontiers in Public Health 2022; 10.
28. Philippens N, Janssen E, Kremers S, Crutzen R. Determinants of natural adult sleep: An umbrella review. PLOS ONE 2022; 17(11): e0277323.
29. Poole R, Kennedy OJ, Roderick P, Fallowfield JA, Hayes PC, Parkes J. Coffee consumption and health: umbrella review of meta-analyses of multiple health outcomes. BMJ 2017; 359: j5024.
30. Bouras E, Tsilidis KK, Triggi M, Siargkas A, Chourdakis M, Haidich AB. Diet and Risk of Gastric Cancer: An Umbrella Review. Nutrients 2022; 14(9): 1764.
31. Houzé B, El-Khatib H, Arbour C. Efficacy, tolerability, and safety of non-pharmacological therapies for chronic pain: An umbrella review on various CAM approaches. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 2017; 79(Pt B): 192-205.
32. Hermelink R, Leitzmann MF, Markozannes G, Tsilidis K, Pukrop T, Berger F, et al. Sedentary behavior and cancer–an umbrella review and meta-analysis. European Journal of Epidemiology 2022; 37(5): 447-60.
33. Fusar-Poli P, Radua J. Ten simple rules for conducting umbrella reviews. Evidence Based Mental Health 2018; 21(3): 95.
34. Page MJ, Shamseer L, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Sampson M, Tricco AC, et al. Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews of Biomedical Research: A Cross-Sectional Study. PLOS Medicine 2016; 13(5): e1002028.
35. Pieper D, Antoine SL, Mathes T, Neugebauer EA, Eikermann M. Systematic review finds overlapping reviews were not mentioned in every other overview. J Clin Epidemiol 2014; 67(4): 368-75.
36. McKenzie JE, Brennan SE. Overviews of systematic reviews: great promise, greater challenge. Systematic Reviews 2017; 6(1): 185.
37. Pollock M, Fernandes RM, Newton AS, Scott SD, Hartling L. A decision tool to help researchers make decisions about including systematic reviews in overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions. Systematic Reviews 2019; 8(1): 29.
38. Pollock M, Fernandes RM, Newton AS, Scott SD, Hartling L. The impact of different inclusion decisions on the comprehensiveness and complexity of overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions. Systematic Reviews 2019; 8(1): 18.
39. Aromataris E, Fernandez RS, Godfrey C, Holly C, Khalil H, Tungpunkom P. Chapter 10: Umbrella Reviews. In: Aromataris E, Munn Z, editors. JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis; 2020.
40. Onishi A, Furukawa TA. State-of-the-art reporting. In: Biondi-Zoccai G, editor. Umbrella Reviews: Evidence Synthesis with Overviews of Reviews and Meta-Epidemiologic Studies; 2016. p. 189-202.
41. Papageorgiou SN, Biondi-Zoccai G. Designing the Review. In: Biondi-Zoccai G, editor. Umbrella Reviews: Evidence Synthesis with Overviews of Reviews and Meta-Epidemiologic Studies. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2016. p. 57-80.
42. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, The PG. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLOS Medicine 2009; 6(7): e1000097.
43. Krnic Martinic M, Pieper D, Glatt A, Puljak L. Definition of a systematic review used in overviews of systematic reviews, meta-epidemiological studies and textbooks. BMC Med Res Methodol 2019; 19(1): 203.
44. Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, et al. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions version 6.4 (updated August 2023): Cochrane; 2023.
45. Chinn S. A simple method for converting an odds ratio to effect size for use in meta-analysis. Stat Med 2000; 19(22): 3127-31.
46. Wang R, Papageorghiou AT. Umbrella review-a useful tool when it's raining systematic reviews. BJOG 2021; 128(13): 2150.
47. Choi GJ, Kang H. The umbrella review: a useful strategy in the rain of evidence. Korean J Pain 2022; 35(2): 127-8.
48. Aromataris E, Fernandez R, Godfrey CM, Holly C, Khalil H, Tungpunkom P. Summarizing systematic reviews: methodological development, conduct and reporting of an umbrella review approach. Int J Evid Based Healthc 2015; 13(3): 132-40.
49. Shea BJ, Grimshaw JM, Wells GA, Boers M, Andersson N, Hamel C, et al. Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol 2007; 7: 10.
50. Shea BJ, Reeves BC, Wells G, Thuku M, Hamel C, Moran J, et al. AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both. BMJ 2017; 358: j4008.
51. Whiting P, Savović J, Higgins JP, Caldwell DM, Reeves BC, Shea B, et al. ROBIS: A new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed. J Clin Epidemiol 2016; 69: 225-34.
52. Holly C. Umbrella Reviews. In: Holly C, Salmond S, Saimbert M, editors. Comprehensive Systematic Review for Advanced Practice Nursing. 3rd. ed. New York: Springer; 2022.
53. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Schünemann HJ, Tugwell P, Knottnerus A. GRADE guidelines: a new series of articles in the Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. J Clin Epidemiol 2011; 64(4): 380-2.
54. Guyatt G, Oxman AD, Akl EA, Kunz R, Vist G, Brozek J, et al. GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction-GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables. J Clin Epidemiol 2011; 64(4): 383-94.
55. Hultcrantz M, Rind D, Akl EA, Treweek S, Mustafa RA, Iorio A, et al. The GRADE Working Group clarifies the construct of certainty of evidence. J Clin Epidemiol 2017; 87: 4-13.
56. Balshem H, Helfand M, Schünemann HJ, Oxman AD, Kunz R, Brozek J, et al. GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence. J Clin Epidemiol 2011; 64(4): 401-6.
57. Ballard M, Montgomery P. Risk of bias in overviews of reviews: a scoping review of methodological guidance and four-item checklist. Research Synthesis Methods 2017; 8(1): 92-108.
58. Deeks JJ, Higgins JP, Altman DG, Group CSM. Analysing data and undertaking meta‐analyses. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions; 2022. p. 241-84.
59. Salanti G, Del Giovane C, Chaimani A, Caldwell DM, Higgins JP. Evaluating the quality of evidence from a network meta-analysis. PLOS ONE 2014; 9(7): e99682.
60. Chaimani A, Caldwell DM, Li T, Higgins JP, Salanti G. Undertaking network meta‐analyses. Cochrane Handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. 2019: 285-320.
61. Rezaeian M. An Introduction to Umbrella Reviews. JRUMS 2019; 18(7): 621-2. [Farsi]
62. Pollock A, Campbell P, Brunton G, Hunt H, Estcourt L. Selecting and implementing overview methods: implications from five exemplar overviews. Systematic Reviews 2017; 6(1): 145.
63. Cant R, Ryan C, Kelly MA. A nine-step pathway to conduct an umbrella review of literature. Nurse Author & Editor 2022; 32(2): 31-4..
ارسال پیام به نویسنده مسئول
| بازنشر اطلاعات | |
 |
این مقاله تحت شرایط Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License قابل بازنشر است. |
